Survivorship
bias is a cognitive bias that occurs when someone tries to make a decision
based on past successes, while ignoring past failures. It is a specific type of
selection bias.
Suppose
you're trying to help the military decide how best to armour their planes for
future bombing runs. They let you look over the planes that made it back, and
you note that some areas get shot heavily, while other areas hardly get shot at
all. So, you should increase the armour on the areas that get shot, right?
Wrong!
These are the planes that got shot and survived. It stands to reason that on
some planes, the areas where you don't see any damage did get shot, and they
didn't survive. So those are the areas you reinforce. This was the brilliant
deduction of Abraham Wald, a Hungarian-born Jewish statistician who fled Europe
to work for the US military during World War II, which also goes to show you
that you shouldn't try to kill your best thinkers.
Other examples
Survivorship
bias is also at play when considering the quality of artistic works throughout
history. It's easy to look at Shakespeare and think that writers today are much
less intelligent than they were in his day, but there were also plenty of
writers of Shakespeare's day whose work wasn't as good, and so either didn't
survive into the modern era or lacked the influence on Anglophone discourse
that Shakespeare achieved. Used in this
way, survivorship bias can lead to nostalgia for an imagined glorious past.
Survivorship
bias can obscure the effects of workplace exposure upon health problems. When
new employees with prior exposure to, say, asbestos or silica are
inappropriately combined with employees without prior exposure, the apparent exposure
effect is reduced. Employees exposed at prior jobs become ill sooner than
previously unexposed employees making exposure at the current employee appear
negligible.
No comments:
Post a Comment